When it comes to matters of finance, one cannot afford to be speculative. Overestimating and underestimating, both are unwise. Many people take a conservative approach and then fall in troubled waters. Many people overestimate the costs and get discouraged. It is necessary to have a completely pragmatic approach and one must be factual. There is no substitute for numbers, especially when you have to figure out the true cost of studying in the USA.
Let us begin with a few basics and the obvious costs. Studying in the US at a public college with a two year course or degree program will cost you about $3,347. A four year program will cost you $9,139. A four year program at for an outstate student, one who is not a resident of the state, in a public college will cost $22,958. If you aren’t American and intend to study in the US then the cost would be much higher. State sponsored public education systems are only meant for those residing in that state. Hence, residents of other states don’t get the subsidy and thus pay more. Foreign students will pay much more. A private college that’s a nonprofit organization will charge more than $30,000 for a four year degree program.
These costs are just for tuition and fees. There’s room and boarding charges. You are looking at $7,705 as a resident of the state for two years, $9,804 for four years, $9,804 for four years if you are not a resident of the state and $11,188 if you opt for private colleges.
Thus, you are looking at a minimum cost of $11,052 per year and it can go up to as much as $42,419 and more in some cases.
The true cost to study in the US would also have to consider other associated expenses. Not everyone will get admission in public colleges and that would make private colleges imperative. Foreign students will have many other expenses such as airfares, cost of living, sending parcels to USA and to one’s country of origin and there are numerous other expenses. While there are some smart ways to save money such as living with roommates, endorsing austerity measures and hiring companies like Courierpoint that would charge much less for typical shipments compared to others, the eventual expense will have to be stringently budgeted and one must not have loopholes in the plan.
We can call leadership as a process of leading, an act of leading by one or more entities. Leadership can also be defined as ability or the capacity to change human behavior that can achieve a target assigned by leader. You can refer leadership as an extraordinary quality a man or a woman may posses. A person having leadership qualities may give direction or guidance to some other person. This is called “actual” exercise of leadership. Emperors of very few countries have been able to give satisfactory leadership.
Leadership can have informal and formal aspects. Formal aspect can be seen in most business and political leadership while informal aspect can be seen in most friendships. Leadership, which is an abstract term usually, means entities that do the job of leading posses some leadership skills. Leadership qualities have the ability to inspire and influence many associates. Leadership process can be developed through a process of training, self-study, education and experience.
Leaders accomplish their tasks by applying leadership attributes such as values, ethics, knowledge, skills and beliefs. If you are a supervisor, managers then you have the authority to achieve certain tasks. This does not mean that you are the leader. You are just a boss. Leadership makes the associates want to accomplish high goals and not go bossing people around.
Some personality attributes may lead the person into leadership roles naturally
A hostile situation or an important event in a person’s life may bring some extraordinary qualities in that ordinary person and the person may rise to that occasion. You can also learn leadership skills and choose to become great leaders. That is you can transform yourself to become a leader. The foundation of good leadership is having an honorable character and giving selfless service to your country or organization. Self-serving leaders may not be that effective as their associates only obey them. They do not follow the leader. A good leadership motivates and provides direction to its employees.
An effective leadership builds confidence and trust among its associates. Employee satisfaction is a vital key to effective leadership. Leadership should be able to effectively communicate with the employees. Effective communication is a key to winning company’s confidence and trust. In short, your leadership should be trustworthy.
In order to develop leadership qualities, you should seek self-improvement. You should strength your attributes. You should take responsibility as well as seek responsibility.
Find ways for your organization to achieve new heights. Develop your decision-making and problem solving skills. If things go wrong in your company do not blame your employees. Instead, take some corrective action and look for the next challenge. Make correct and timely decisions. Try to know your employees and take care of them. Make sure that tasks are well understood and accomplished. Try to develop a team spirit among your associates and employees. By doing this your employees will work to their full capabilities. Be technically proficient in your job and you should posses a good familiarity with the employees tasks.
Every leader needs leadership training. Right? Have you ever had a boss who didn’t? Every player needs a coach. Right? Have you ever met a sports star without?
In fact, leaders are in constant need of leadership training. It’s the nature of the beast. To be truly effective to the best of their abilities, leaders must continuously analyze their behavior, seek feedback from those around them and constantly work on improving their leadership skills.
Leadership training is one way to gain new knowledge and learn new skills. It’s focused and intense. And the usual training getaway from being in the saddle 24/7 is much needed by any and all leaders.
The best types of leadership training include grappling with real-life situations. The latest and greatest theories are important, but they are no substitute for tackling tough, complex leadership challenges as though one’s life depended on it. Because it does.
Top notch leadership training not only teaches critical skills, but also gives participants the opportunity to practice what they’re learning through role plays and other training techniques. People need to “feel” the problem and wrestle with the solution to truly learn.
But leadership training is not enough. As Edwin Friedman wrote in A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix, “Mature leadership begins with the leader’s capacity to take responsibility for his or her own emotional being and destiny.” Understanding one’s emotional being and harnessing it for powerful leadership is a process, not a skill.
That’s where leadership coaching enters the scene as the powerful partner of leadership training. Coaching is an ongoing process that helps leaders build on lessons learned in leadership training and apply them in real life situations.
Behavior is driven by emotion. Yet leaders rarely take time and seek assistance to understand their emotional selves that drive their behavioral selves. It is much easier to attend leadership training workshops, read books about leadership skills and commit to implementing what one has learned. But understanding one’s emotional self and emotional intelligence is precisely what one must do to move from being a good leader to great leader. Coaches are worth their weight in gold when they help school leaders understand their emotional selves and take responsibility for changing.
In a coaching relationship, the coach helps the coachee understand his or her emotional self and the ways in which that self drives behavior. One excellent tool that coaches can use to help school leaders understand and improve their emotional selves and intelligence is the EQ-i (Emotional Quotient Inventory). It measures emotional intelligence in the following areas: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, Stress Management, Adaptability and General Mood. All are critical to being a great leader.
Leadership training combined with ongoing leadership coaching is a powerful combination that helps school leaders become truly great leaders. Through training, leaders hone skills, but most importantly, through coaching they learn to execute the critical plays under pressure.
Leadership qualities are a bundle of qualities that a person should possess in order to lead a team successfully. The most important thing that one should understand about leadership qualities is that they cannot be acquired by learning more and more management related books but they should be understood well and practiced. The team leadership should be a good example for his or her team members and should be able to lead the team the right way to increase the productivity. The team leader should be patient yet should also be able to give orders in a way that would motivate the team members to do it and not try to dominate them. In order to get the best out of the team and to increase production the team leader should lead the team properly. He or she should at the first place be a good team member and should have a good understanding about the strengths and weaknesses if each team member. This would help the team leader in allotting the right work to the right person. Doing all this would not be as simple as it sounds as the performance of the whole team would depend on how well the team leader leads the team. For this, the team leader should be trained well to handle the team. A personal development program would help you in becoming a good team leader but the training should be undergone from an institution that would guarantee you results.
Landmark education forum offers many programs that would help you in improving your relationship with people who work and live with you and help you in understanding them better. By being a participant in this program, you would not only be improving your personal skills but would also learn on efficiently you can increase the productivity of your team members. You would learn to listen and be patient and as this is an important characteristic that any team member should possess, it would be very beneficial if you should be interested in building up a strong team. The positive attitude that you would acquire after attending landmark forum programs would help you in handling problems better and would make you feel more responsible about the team. As only a person with all these qualities would be able to lead a team better, you would be making yourself eligible to be a good team leader.
Landmark education forum programs are all well designed, planned and executed. This is the main reason for their success and thousands of students who have been participants of this program have agreed this. Teamleadership.org has all details about landmark education programs. Make the right choice and get the best from these programs run by landmark education.
I consider myself a well read person. I usually have five or six books I am constantly reading until I finish them and move on to my next batch of books. My favorite readings for relaxation are about personal development, leadership development, organizational development and management, politics, history and biographies. I would rather read non-fictional material versus fictional and I would rather read about futuristic concepts than science fiction material.
Now, the purpose for all this elaboration of what I’ve read or what I like reading; I never in research I’ve conducted academically or academic materials provided to me in my professional career; have I ever seen any material about IQ in relations to being a leader or being in a leadership roles. I have observed throughout my career individuals with quite a high IQ and yet have very little leadership skills. Quite frankly, many individuals that I have met throughout my career in the medical profession, political career and in education the higher the IQ the more introverted many were. On the other hand; some I have worked with the lower the “IQ” the more charismatic, outgoing and an ability to work the crowd; therefore, in many cases; drafted by the people to serve as a leader for a particular cause or venture.
IQ has nothing to do with getting people to do things for you; it is about relationship building and offering service to others for the purpose of helping them become achievers. IQ could play a role in the designing of formulas and/or blue prints that will be used as part of the space shuttle as work like that typically is attributed to ones capabilities of high technical analyzes and synthesizing. Though some or most with high IQ’s tend to be high achiever in the technical arena or what I call the hard sciences; they often times display behavior modes of consistency, productive and yet sometimes loners determine to find answers to the unknown.
When we observe those that are in the below average category in terms of IQ; we often times find individuals that are challenged with loyalty to the company and work productivity and lack of execution. In many instances, research reveals to us that many have attitude issues, finger pointing and initiative issues. Yes some of our leaders indeed had high IQ’s but it didn’t necessarily make them phenomenal leaders; it just made them bright individuals attempting to lead. And, yet we have had others who have a mediocre IQ and yet were phenomenal leaders; with an ability to listen, research solutions and jump on with the wave of charisma; enough to get others to follow. I think of President Ronald Reagan with a mediocre IQ who became a phenomenal leader of one of the world’s most powerful country in the world and President Jimmy Carter with a high IQ yet had a real challenge making significant achievements. President Carter was a detail person, a workaholic and a micromanager and it has been said that he often times worked to two, three a.m. in the morning.
I have not seen any prove that those with a low IQ will be low performers or that they will be incompetent and so therefore will not be able to handle the job. Throughout my career I have seen both; the high IQ and the low IQ people deal with issues of attitude and that is the central theme here; does attitude play a role in being productive, progressive and an achiever. Does IQ have an interplaying role between attitude and leadership or attitude with regards to one’s self pride of IQ.
You see there are those who’s IQ takes them on to the road of being overly prideful of who they are and nothing is above and beyond them. I have known some really brilliant people whom have ended up behind bars because of the scheming they were involved with yet failed to see the truth do to their arrogance of having a high IQ.
No one is exempted from stress and that is a fact of life. School administrators, with the aim to provide quality education thus hire excellent teachers who can deliver. Along with this mission to serve is the expected stress. School administrators are therefore not immune to the effects of stress.
School administrators and stress management have become the topics of many books that are recently published. These books tackled on the relationship of school administrators and stress management and how the latter affects the former.
One of the brave souls that authored a book on school administrators and stress management is Dr. Andrea Thompson. Dr. Thompson is an expert on the field of educational leadership having finished her post-graduate studies from Barry University, Florida. Her book entitled “Stress Management for School Administrators: A Survival Guide” is anchored on the fact that school administrators are constantly bombarded with complaints from students and parents. Likewise, they also have to deal with issues from teachers and other personnel. The book is highlighting the myriads of ways school administrators can cop with the different sources of stress that they have to constantly deal with, lest it would wear them down.
Faced with the dilemma of handling their subordinates’ stress, school administrators too have to deal with their own. Managing stress in school setting is as challenging a task as providing quality education and retaining excellent teachers. Hence school administrators have to hurdle stressful situations lest it impede the growth of the school and likewise might strain their relationship with teachers, students, and parents.
Schools owners likewise, at their end, are looking for school administrators who can handle pressure and stressful situations. The fact still remains that owners of schools in America are daunted with the task on how to attract, develop and retain potential school administrators. This concern has been plaguing the four corners of educational field. Would-be school administrators in the US are fazed with the truth that the stress that their future jobs entail is costly, especially to their mental, physical and emotional health. Hence, the school administration positions available did not actually attract a considerable number of applicants.
In a study conducted by Lynette J. Fields of University of South Florida, St. Petersburg has revealed that school administrators in this case the principals who are in their first year of the taking the post were mostly stressed due to the demands of their time that seemed difficult to control, staff and teachers, and the conflicts among the personnel. Likewise first-time assistant principal went though the same experience. Moreover, it can be gleaned from the study that principals and assistant principals have different sources of stress. Nevertheless, their coping strategies are more or less the same like laughter, exercise, and expression of pent up emotions.
School administrators and stress management are the concerns of school owners. These two must be equally given proper attention in order to maximize potential and resources.